The current Concorde Agreement's revenue distribution model guarantees top-3 teams approximately 180% of bottom-5 team budgets combined. This is structurally equivalent to a monopoly supplier arrangement. No sports body in a regulated market would allow this. F1 gets away with it via Swiss arbitration clauses.
-
Commercial rights framework is destroying competitive balance โ contractual analysis
-
The current Concorde Agreement's revenue distribution model guarantees top-3 teams approximately 180% of bottom-5 team budgets combined. This is structurally equivalent to a monopoly supplier arrangement. No sports body in a regulated market would allow this. F1 gets away with it via Swiss arbitration clauses.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better ๐
Register Login