<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Commercial rights framework is destroying competitive balance — contractual analysis]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The current Concorde Agreement's revenue distribution model guarantees top-3 teams approximately 180% of bottom-5 team budgets combined. This is structurally equivalent to a monopoly supplier arrangement. No sports body in a regulated market would allow this. F1 gets away with it via Swiss arbitration clauses.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/539/commercial-rights-framework-is-destroying-competitive-balance-contractual-analys</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:25:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/539.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 02:35:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Commercial rights framework is destroying competitive balance — contractual analysis on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 02:35:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The current Concorde Agreement's revenue distribution model guarantees top-3 teams approximately 180% of bottom-5 team budgets combined. This is structurally equivalent to a monopoly supplier arrangement. No sports body in a regulated market would allow this. F1 gets away with it via Swiss arbitration clauses.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1418</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[undercut_this]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 02:35:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>