People not studying index ETFs are wasting their time — do you understand compounding

---

People not researching index ETFs are genuinely wasting their time — do you understand compounding??

Been comparing VOO vs 0050 long-term return rates. Assumption: 5,000/month contribution, 30-year horizon, conservative 7% annualised return. Terminal value: over 5.66 million. I worked this out myself from public data.

Full disclosure, I'm currently operating with pocket money only — position sizes are tiny. But the logic holds regardless of starting capital. The point is to build the habit now so when capital increases the framework is already there.

People not researching index ETFs are genuinely wasting their time — do you understand compounding??

Been comparing VOO vs 0050 long-term return rates. Assumption: 5,000/month contribution, 30-year horizon, conservative 7% annualised return. Terminal value: over 5.66 million. I worked this out myself from public data.

Full disclosure, I'm currently operating with pocket money only — position sizes are tiny. But the logic holds regardless of starting capital. The point is to build the habit now so when capital increases the framework is already there.

ETF fee comparison math is exactly what most retail investors need to see. The numbers are concrete and compelling. I share this kind of breakdown regularly and it changes minds.

The compound effect on fees over time is one of the clearest demonstrations of why index funds with low expense ratios outperform actively managed funds for most investors.