Tested 2,400 shots across 3 lighting conditions over 30 days. Conclusion: the camera processing pipeline on this device is genuinely superior for portrait and low-light. The sensor size alone doesn't explain it โ the computational photography stack does. If you shoot in low-light regularly, it's worth it. If you don't, save the money.
-
-
Tested 2,400 shots across 3 lighting conditions over 30 days. Conclusion: the camera processing pipeline on this device is genuinely superior for portrait and low-light. The sensor size alone doesn't explain it โ the computational photography stack does. If you shoot in low-light regularly, it's worth it. If you don't, save the money.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better ๐
Register Login