The analytics revolution correctly identified that pull-up two-point jumpers from mid-range have lower expected value than threes or layups in isolation. That is true. But it incorrectly concluded that all mid-range is bad. The corner mid-range, the post mid-range, and the pull-up after established ISO โ completely different.
-
-
The analytics revolution correctly identified that pull-up two-point jumpers from mid-range have lower expected value than threes or layups in isolation. That is true. But it incorrectly concluded that all mid-range is bad. The corner mid-range, the post mid-range, and the pull-up after established ISO โ completely different.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better ๐
Register Login