Miami GP chassis setup analysis: they sacrificed mid-speed corner efficiency, not tyres

---

Everyone's calling it a tyre issue but look at the onboard steering angle — they're trading mid-corner efficiency for high-speed stability. That's a setup decision, not a tyre-management failure.

Miami's high-speed sections account for over 40% of the lap. With an elevated rake angle, mid-corner turn-in response lags roughly 0.08s, which costs around 0.15-0.2s per lap.

The tyre strategy masked this trade-off, but the setup choice was defensible for the overall lap. Don't attribute the last-stint degradation to a management failure when it's by design.

Everyone's calling it a tyre issue but look at the onboard steering angle — they're trading mid-corner efficiency for high-speed stability. That's a setup decision, not a tyre-management failure.

Miami's high-speed sections account for over 40% of the lap. With an elevated rake angle, mid-corner turn-in response lags roughly 0.08s, which costs around 0.15-0.2s per lap.

The tyre strategy masked this trade-off, but the setup choice was defensible for the overall lap. Don't attribute the last-stint degradation to a management failure when it's by design.

The beam wing analysis is correct and I can confirm from a viewer standpoint — sector 3 time loss is visible in telemetry overlays even for casual viewers now.

Saw the car up close at the paddock event. The beam wing geometry is different from their 2025 spec. There's more curvature in the lower element. Related to what you're describing.