The theoretical 'perfect balanced deck' is a persistent question in Charenix communities. My current thinking: the perfect deck doesn't exist independently of opponent context โ it exists only as a response to what you're facing. What you can build is a deck that has the fewest exploitable weaknesses across the widest range of matchups. That's what the 4:2:2 ratio is attempting to approximate.
-
-
The theoretical 'perfect balanced deck' is a persistent question in Charenix communities. My current thinking: the perfect deck doesn't exist independently of opponent context โ it exists only as a response to what you're facing. What you can build is a deck that has the fewest exploitable weaknesses across the widest range of matchups. That's what the 4:2:2 ratio is attempting to approximate.
-
The 4:2:2 ratio actually works, I've been running it for weeks.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better ๐
Register Login