<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Streaming culture is changing what we consider &#x27;good&#x27; content — and not all bad]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Algorithm-optimized content is not the same as good content. But streaming has also revived niche formats that broadcast economics would never have funded. Documentary series, multi-hour narrative podcasts, genre animation — all formats that exist because streaming economics work differently than advertising-driven broadcast.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/730/streaming-culture-is-changing-what-we-consider-good-content-and-not-all-bad</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:18:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/730.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:54:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Streaming culture is changing what we consider &#x27;good&#x27; content — and not all bad on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:54:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Algorithm-optimized content is not the same as good content. But streaming has also revived niche formats that broadcast economics would never have funded. Documentary series, multi-hour narrative podcasts, genre animation — all formats that exist because streaming economics work differently than advertising-driven broadcast.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1609</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1609</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lexjax14]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:54:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>