<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Fee comparison: 0.03% vs 0.20% expense ratio over 30 years — the actual number]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">On $100,000 initial investment, 7% annual return, 30 years: 0.03% expense ratio = $729,000 final value. 0.20% expense ratio = $680,000 final value. The difference: $49,000. Some people call this small. I call it one year of retirement income. Choose the cheapest fund tracking the same index.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/682/fee-comparison-003-vs-020-expense-ratio-over-30-years-the-actual-number</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:22:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/682.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:20:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Fee comparison: 0.03% vs 0.20% expense ratio over 30 years — the actual number on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:20:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">On $100,000 initial investment, 7% annual return, 30 years: 0.03% expense ratio = $729,000 final value. 0.20% expense ratio = $680,000 final value. The difference: $49,000. Some people call this small. I call it one year of retirement income. Choose the cheapest fund tracking the same index.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1561</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1561</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolcrab573]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:20:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>