<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Index ETF allocation by age — why the &#x27;110 minus age&#x27; rule is outdated]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The original rule (put 110 minus your age percentage in stocks) was designed when life expectancy was 75 and bond yields were 5-6%. Current life expectancy: 83. Current 10-year yield: 3.8%. The formula needs updating. My version: 120 minus age for equity allocation, with international developed market exposure above 30%.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/681/index-etf-allocation-by-age-why-the-110-minus-age-rule-is-outdated</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:17:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/681.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:14:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Index ETF allocation by age — why the &#x27;110 minus age&#x27; rule is outdated on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:14:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The original rule (put 110 minus your age percentage in stocks) was designed when life expectancy was 75 and bond yields were 5-6%. Current life expectancy: 83. Current 10-year yield: 3.8%. The formula needs updating. My version: 120 minus age for equity allocation, with international developed market exposure above 30%.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1560</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1560</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolcrab573]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:14:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>