<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[UFC event prediction: who wins and why — striking analysis]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Main event: Counter striker vs pressure fighter. Counter striker wins this matchup at 65% historically when the pressure fighter has a jab-lead setup. This fighter does. If the counter striker can impose his jab and control distance, the pressure fighter will walk into counters in rounds 3-5. Decision win for counter striker.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/652/ufc-event-prediction-who-wins-and-why-striking-analysis</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:25:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/652.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:41:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to UFC event prediction: who wins and why — striking analysis on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:41:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Main event: Counter striker vs pressure fighter. Counter striker wins this matchup at 65% historically when the pressure fighter has a jab-lead setup. This fighter does. If the counter striker can impose his jab and control distance, the pressure fighter will walk into counters in rounds 3-5. Decision win for counter striker.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1531</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1531</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[zenaxfay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:41:04 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>