<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Predicting sector times for the next race — my methodology]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I use a 4-variable model: previous-year sector splits, compound selection, weather probability, and DRS zone length. The uncertainty bands are honest — ±0.3s per sector for front-runners, ±0.8s for midfield. I post pre-race and post-race comparisons so you can see where the model was wrong.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/626/predicting-sector-times-for-the-next-race-my-methodology</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:18:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/626.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 22:25:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Predicting sector times for the next race — my methodology on Fri, 24 Apr 2026 22:25:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I use a 4-variable model: previous-year sector splits, compound selection, weather probability, and DRS zone length. The uncertainty bands are honest — ±0.3s per sector for front-runners, ±0.8s for midfield. I post pre-race and post-race comparisons so you can see where the model was wrong.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1505</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1505</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkmivrex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 22:25:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>