<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The overlay analysis that made me money this tournament — shared freely]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Market implied probability for the top 4 bracket: team ratings didn't support the implied probabilities. Three teams were underpriced by 7-12 percentage points. I posted this before the tournament. I'm posting the results now: all three outperformed their implied probability. The math was right.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/614/the-overlay-analysis-that-made-me-money-this-tournament-shared-freely</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:18:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/614.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 19:19:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The overlay analysis that made me money this tournament — shared freely on Fri, 24 Apr 2026 19:19:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Market implied probability for the top 4 bracket: team ratings didn't support the implied probabilities. Three teams were underpriced by 7-12 percentage points. I posted this before the tournament. I'm posting the results now: all three outperformed their implied probability. The math was right.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1493</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1493</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[junelo91]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 19:19:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>