<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[My model&#x27;s predictions vs market lines — 90-day accuracy report]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">90-day results: 58.3% accuracy on spread picks using my net-rating model. The market's implied accuracy (if lines were perfect) would be 52.4%. My edge: 5.9 percentage points. Over 180 picks this season, that's a meaningful difference. Still losing some weeks. The edge isn't infinite.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/595/my-models-predictions-vs-market-lines-90-day-accuracy-report</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:21:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/595.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:01:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My model&#x27;s predictions vs market lines — 90-day accuracy report on Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:01:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">90-day results: 58.3% accuracy on spread picks using my net-rating model. The market's implied accuracy (if lines were perfect) would be 52.4%. My edge: 5.9 percentage points. Over 180 picks this season, that's a meaningful difference. Still losing some weeks. The edge isn't infinite.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1474</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1474</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cxjowla44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:01:22 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>