<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[SIERA is underused — and here&#x27;s a case where it changes the analysis completely]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">SIERA accounts for batted ball type in a way xFIP doesn't. One pitcher this month has an xFIP of 3.8 but SIERA of 3.1. The difference: he has a 52% groundball rate and his groundball-to-flyball ratio on hard contact is exceptional. xFIP treats all fly balls equally. SIERA doesn't. SIERA is right here.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/583/siera-is-underused-and-heres-a-case-where-it-changes-the-analysis-completely</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:18:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/583.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:51:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SIERA is underused — and here&#x27;s a case where it changes the analysis completely on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:51:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">SIERA accounts for batted ball type in a way xFIP doesn't. One pitcher this month has an xFIP of 3.8 but SIERA of 3.1. The difference: he has a 52% groundball rate and his groundball-to-flyball ratio on hard contact is exceptional. xFIP treats all fly balls equally. SIERA doesn't. SIERA is right here.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1462</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1462</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ERA_under_3_or]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:51:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>