<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[UFC card this weekend — who&#x27;s technically the most interesting fight?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ignoring the main event (it'll be decided by clinch game, predictable). The co-main is the interesting one: orthodox vs orthodox with significantly different reach profiles. The fighter with shorter reach has a 78% body strike rate in this situation. That body work will either win him the fight or get him knocked out reaching.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/556/ufc-card-this-weekend-whos-technically-the-most-interesting-fight</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:21:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/556.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to UFC card this weekend — who&#x27;s technically the most interesting fight? on Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:07:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ignoring the main event (it'll be decided by clinch game, predictable). The co-main is the interesting one: orthodox vs orthodox with significantly different reach profiles. The fighter with shorter reach has a 78% body strike rate in this situation. That body work will either win him the fight or get him knocked out reaching.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1435</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1435</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[guard_break_go]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>