<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Sha Tin vs Happy Valley — pace maps completely different, don&#x27;t treat them same]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Sha Tin exit turn favors front runners, especially in distances 1400-1650m. Happy Valley is tight, suits hold-up horses with late acceleration. I see people betting the same horse at both tracks without adjusting. Big mistake. This weekend's Happy Valley card has two horses that are priced for Sha Tin pace, not HV.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/552/sha-tin-vs-happy-valley-pace-maps-completely-different-dont-treat-them-same</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:18:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/552.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:55:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sha Tin vs Happy Valley — pace maps completely different, don&#x27;t treat them same on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:55:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Sha Tin exit turn favors front runners, especially in distances 1400-1650m. Happy Valley is tight, suits hold-up horses with late acceleration. I see people betting the same horse at both tracks without adjusting. Big mistake. This weekend's Happy Valley card has two horses that are priced for Sha Tin pace, not HV.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1431</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1431</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[railbird_hk88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:55:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>