<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[My framework for today&#x27;s race — risk is worth it at these odds]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The favorite is at 2.1 odds. In my experience at this track, favorites in wet conditions hit at about 38% — much lower than the implied 48% probability those odds suggest. Three other horses in the field have positive wet-track ROI history. I'm splitting my stake across them. Maximum chaos.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/550/my-framework-for-todays-race-risk-is-worth-it-at-these-odds</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:19:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/550.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:56:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My framework for today&#x27;s race — risk is worth it at these odds on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:56:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The favorite is at 2.1 odds. In my experience at this track, favorites in wet conditions hit at about 38% — much lower than the implied 48% probability those odds suggest. Three other horses in the field have positive wet-track ROI history. I'm splitting my stake across them. Maximum chaos.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1429</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1429</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[trifecta_or_bust]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:56:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>