<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The inconsistency in today&#x27;s penalty is legally indefensible — here&#x27;s why]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">In the 2009 Belgian GP, similar incident, 25-second penalty. In 2014 Singapore, similar incident, drive-through. Today: nothing. The FIA's stewards guidelines require precedent consistency under Article 12 of the Sporting Regulations. This isn't my opinion — this is the documented standard they published themselves.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/537/the-inconsistency-in-todays-penalty-is-legally-indefensible-heres-why</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:17:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/537.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:44:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The inconsistency in today&#x27;s penalty is legally indefensible — here&#x27;s why on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:44:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">In the 2009 Belgian GP, similar incident, 25-second penalty. In 2014 Singapore, similar incident, drive-through. Today: nothing. The FIA's stewards guidelines require precedent consistency under Article 12 of the Sporting Regulations. This isn't my opinion — this is the documented standard they published themselves.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1416</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1416</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[undercut_this]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:44:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>