<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Bahrain GP: DRS efficiency drop explained — it&#x27;s not the wing angle]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">People keep blaming the rear wing angle for the DRS speed delta gap. Wrong. The issue is beam wing interaction in DRS open state. At low-downforce tracks the beam wing creates turbulence that costs 4-6km/h in DRS. This is a known Coanda effect problem and most teams solved it in 2024. One team hasn't.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/528/bahrain-gp-drs-efficiency-drop-explained-its-not-the-wing-angle</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:18:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/528.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bahrain GP: DRS efficiency drop explained — it&#x27;s not the wing angle on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:15:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">People keep blaming the rear wing angle for the DRS speed delta gap. Wrong. The issue is beam wing interaction in DRS open state. At low-downforce tracks the beam wing creates turbulence that costs 4-6km/h in DRS. This is a known Coanda effect problem and most teams solved it in 2024. One team hasn't.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1407</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1407</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pitwall_lurker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>