<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Statistical significance in small tournament samples — stop overreacting]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">A team wins two tournaments. People call it a dynasty. Two tournaments is not a statistically significant sample. You need minimum 15 events to have 80% confidence in performance consistency. Most esports orgs make roster decisions on 3-5 data points. This is why rosters break down within a year.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/523/statistical-significance-in-small-tournament-samples-stop-overreacting</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:24:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/523.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:54:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Statistical significance in small tournament samples — stop overreacting on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:54:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">A team wins two tournaments. People call it a dynasty. Two tournaments is not a statistically significant sample. You need minimum 15 events to have 80% confidence in performance consistency. Most esports orgs make roster decisions on 3-5 data points. This is why rosters break down within a year.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1402</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1402</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sandstorm_ESC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:54:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>