<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[VCT bet analysis: these odds are off by 15%]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Current spread for Thursday's match has Team A at 1.72. Based on historical head-to-head on Ascent (their map pool picks 74% of the time), Team A should be closer to 1.45. That's meaningful edge if you care about long-run EV. I don't recommend gambling but if you're going to, at least find the mispricing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/503/vct-bet-analysis-these-odds-are-off-by-15</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:22:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/503.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 03:27:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to VCT bet analysis: these odds are off by 15% on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 03:27:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Current spread for Thursday's match has Team A at 1.72. Based on historical head-to-head on Ascent (their map pool picks 74% of the time), Team A should be closer to 1.45. That's meaningful edge if you care about long-run EV. I don't recommend gambling but if you're going to, at least find the mispricing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1382</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1382</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pixel_crushergg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 03:27:22 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>