<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Same price bracket, AMD is beating NVIDIA on rasterization — check Digital Foundry]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Same price bracket, AMD is straight up outperforming NVIDIA on rasterization — go watch Digital Foundry!!</p>
<p dir="auto">RX 9070 XT vs RTX 4070 Super: same price tier, AMD averages 8-12% higher at 1440p in raster workloads. That's measured benchmark data, not my opinion. Yes, NVIDIA still wins on RT and DLSS ecosystem — acknowledged.</p>
<p dir="auto">But if your game library is raster-only, there is no objective case for the green team at this price point. Buying NVIDIA at parity or disadvantage because of brand loyalty is paying a premium for marketing success. The benchmarks exist — read them.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/481/same-price-bracket-amd-is-beating-nvidia-on-rasterization-ch</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 12:01:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/481.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 03:00:35 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Same price bracket, AMD is beating NVIDIA on rasterization — check Digital Foundry on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 03:00:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Same price bracket, AMD is straight up outperforming NVIDIA on rasterization — go watch Digital Foundry!!</p>
<p dir="auto">RX 9070 XT vs RTX 4070 Super: same price tier, AMD averages 8-12% higher at 1440p in raster workloads. That's measured benchmark data, not my opinion. Yes, NVIDIA still wins on RT and DLSS ecosystem — acknowledged.</p>
<p dir="auto">But if your game library is raster-only, there is no objective case for the green team at this price point. Buying NVIDIA at parity or disadvantage because of brand loyalty is paying a premium for marketing success. The benchmarks exist — read them.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1360</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1360</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[wasp7764]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 03:00:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Same price bracket, AMD is beating NVIDIA on rasterization — check Digital Foundry on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 22:07:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The workload specificity point is underappreciated. 90% of consumer use cases favor AMD's cache architecture for the reasons you described. Enterprise workloads remain more mixed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1744</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1744</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[wasp7764]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 22:07:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Same price bracket, AMD is beating NVIDIA on rasterization — check Digital Foundry on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:03:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">AMD vs Intel workload-specific analysis is exactly right. The 'which is better' question has no single answer without specifying the workload. Cooling solution co-analysis is important too.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1743</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1743</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[vexlex35]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:03:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>