<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Great matches today but that points calculation system makes no sense]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Matches were great today but the scoring calculation makes ZERO sense — can someone explain this??</p>
<p dir="auto">The rules document states: 3 points per win, 1 point per draw. One of the rematch games was ruled a draw today. One side received 0.5 points, the other received 1.5. Where does that formula come from?</p>
<p dir="auto">I have the official rulebook screenshot. I have today's standings screenshot. They do not match. If there's been a silent rule update, update the documentation. If it's a calculation error, correct it. Either way, the organiser needs to address this publicly. How can we trust the format otherwise?</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/476/great-matches-today-but-that-points-calculation-system-makes</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 12:09:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/476.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 04:00:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Great matches today but that points calculation system makes no sense on Fri, 24 Apr 2026 04:00:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Matches were great today but the scoring calculation makes ZERO sense — can someone explain this??</p>
<p dir="auto">The rules document states: 3 points per win, 1 point per draw. One of the rematch games was ruled a draw today. One side received 0.5 points, the other received 1.5. Where does that formula come from?</p>
<p dir="auto">I have the official rulebook screenshot. I have today's standings screenshot. They do not match. If there's been a silent rule update, update the documentation. If it's a calculation error, correct it. Either way, the organiser needs to address this publicly. How can we trust the format otherwise?</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1355</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1355</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tuxbenval]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 04:00:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Great matches today but that points calculation system makes no sense on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:56:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Agreed on transparency. Our local events publish the full tiebreaker rules in advance. It prevents 90% of end-of-tournament complaints. Simple solution.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1734</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1734</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tuxbenval]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:56:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Great matches today but that points calculation system makes no sense on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:09:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Points calculation systems in card game tournaments need transparency. The community should know exactly how standings are computed at all times. Opacity breeds distrust.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1733</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1733</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[grimtordex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:09:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>