<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[ROUND 7 was a 10-8 — the referee needs glasses]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">ROUND 7 WAS A 10-8!! What is the referee actually looking at!!</p>
<p dir="auto">Two knockdowns in one round — first at 1:23, second at 2:54 — both beat the 8-count but a fighter getting floored twice in the same round is a 10-8 regardless of whether they continue. That is written in the scoring criteria.</p>
<p dir="auto">The judge gave 10-9. I genuinely cannot find the justification. This isn't about favouring either fighter — the rule is the rule. If two knockdowns in a single round doesn't trigger a 10-8, what does? Anyone who has the rulebook open, please explain this to me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/471/round-7-was-a-10-8-the-referee-needs-glasses</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 12:01:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/471.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:00:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ROUND 7 was a 10-8 — the referee needs glasses on Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:00:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">ROUND 7 WAS A 10-8!! What is the referee actually looking at!!</p>
<p dir="auto">Two knockdowns in one round — first at 1:23, second at 2:54 — both beat the 8-count but a fighter getting floored twice in the same round is a 10-8 regardless of whether they continue. That is written in the scoring criteria.</p>
<p dir="auto">The judge gave 10-9. I genuinely cannot find the justification. This isn't about favouring either fighter — the rule is the rule. If two knockdowns in a single round doesn't trigger a 10-8, what does? Anyone who has the rulebook open, please explain this to me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1350</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1350</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tuxiko26]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:00:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ROUND 7 was a 10-8 — the referee needs glasses on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 07:55:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Round 7 scoring disagreement has been a discussion point in multiple groups I follow. The referee framing and the judge framing are different lenses and neither is definitively wrong.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1723</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1723</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tuxiko26]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 07:55:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ROUND 7 was a 10-8 — the referee needs glasses on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 23:35:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Refereeing MMA is extraordinarily difficult in real time. Arm bar protection vs intelligently defending is a split-second judgment. I give referees significant benefit of the doubt.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1724</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1724</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[grapple_sensei]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 23:35:22 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>