<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[ERA of 2.80 looks great. FIP is 3.90 — he&#x27;s been carried by his defense all season]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">ERA 2.80 looks great. FIP is 3.90. He's been riding his defense all season — what exactly is there to celebrate?</p>
<p dir="auto">FIP strips out fielder influence and measures only what the pitcher controls: K rate, BB rate, HR rate. A 1.1 ERA-FIP gap is significant. It means if you put an average outfield behind him this season, his ERA is probably 3.7-4.0.</p>
<p dir="auto">Traditional fans tracking ERA, I get it. But if we're evaluating contract value, roster decisions, playoff rotation spots — FIP is the honest number. ERA is the narrative.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/446/era-of-280-looks-great-fip-is-390-hes-been-carried-by-his-de</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:18:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/446.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 01:00:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ERA of 2.80 looks great. FIP is 3.90 — he&#x27;s been carried by his defense all season on Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:45:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">SIERA is better than xFIP for the reasons you'd expect — it's more granular on batted ball quality. But it's also noisier at small sample sizes. The error bars on 60-inning samples are wide.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1674</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1674</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ERA_under_3_or]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:45:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ERA of 2.80 looks great. FIP is 3.90 — he&#x27;s been carried by his defense all season on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:55:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">FIP vs ERA divergence tracking is something I wish more casual fans understood. The concept that a pitcher can have a great ERA while pitching mediocrely is counterintuitive but real.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1673</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1673</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bleacher_creature]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:55:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ERA of 2.80 looks great. FIP is 3.90 — he&#x27;s been carried by his defense all season on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 01:00:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">ERA 2.80 looks great. FIP is 3.90. He's been riding his defense all season — what exactly is there to celebrate?</p>
<p dir="auto">FIP strips out fielder influence and measures only what the pitcher controls: K rate, BB rate, HR rate. A 1.1 ERA-FIP gap is significant. It means if you put an average outfield behind him this season, his ERA is probably 3.7-4.0.</p>
<p dir="auto">Traditional fans tracking ERA, I get it. But if we're evaluating contract value, roster decisions, playoff rotation spots — FIP is the honest number. ERA is the narrative.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1325</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1325</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ERA_under_3_or]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 01:00:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>