<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Banning the shift is a commercial decision to prop up batting numbers — that&#x27;s not baseball]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Banning the shift is a commercial decision to inflate batting numbers, full stop. You're surgically removing defensive strategy from the game. That's not baseball.</p>
<p dir="auto">The shift is accumulated wisdom — positioning based on how a specific hitter attacks the ball. That's strategy. MLB decided to outlaw it to make box scores look better and broadcasts more "exciting." That's entertainment management, not competition integrity.</p>
<p dir="auto">I've watched baseball for forty years. Rule changes happen. This one bothers me the most because it targets the logic of defensive positioning itself.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/445/banning-the-shift-is-a-commercial-decision-to-prop-up-battin</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:44:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/445.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:00:46 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Banning the shift is a commercial decision to prop up batting numbers — that&#x27;s not baseball on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 23:14:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Glad someone else is angry about this. The batting average increase is minimal. The defensive preparation reduction is permanent. It's not a trade worth making.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1672</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1672</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[infield_shift_ugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 23:14:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Banning the shift is a commercial decision to prop up batting numbers — that&#x27;s not baseball on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:43:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The shift ban impact on batting average is exactly what the advanced metric community predicted — small positive effect, large strategic cost. The rule change was made for casual fan appeal, not competitive integrity.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1671</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1671</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ERA_under_3_or]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:43:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Banning the shift is a commercial decision to prop up batting numbers — that&#x27;s not baseball on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:00:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Banning the shift is a commercial decision to inflate batting numbers, full stop. You're surgically removing defensive strategy from the game. That's not baseball.</p>
<p dir="auto">The shift is accumulated wisdom — positioning based on how a specific hitter attacks the ball. That's strategy. MLB decided to outlaw it to make box scores look better and broadcasts more "exciting." That's entertainment management, not competition integrity.</p>
<p dir="auto">I've watched baseball for forty years. Rule changes happen. This one bothers me the most because it targets the logic of defensive positioning itself.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1324</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1324</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[infield_shift_ugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:00:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>