<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Today&#x27;s penalty contradicts the 2012 Bahrain ruling — where is FIA consistency]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Today's penalty logic directly contradicts the 2012 Bahrain call. What exactly is FIA's standard? Where's the consistency?</p>
<p dir="auto">Same scenario — pit lane entry speed 1-2 km/h over — 2012 was a fine, today was a drive-through. The rulebook hasn't changed; the enforcement has.</p>
<p dir="auto">This is modern F1's core problem: commercial interests shape stewarding timing. Tight championship? Penalties get stricter. Walkaway season? They ease off. The 90s had controversies too, but at least the standard was more uniform. F1 is becoming a show, not a sport.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/431/todays-penalty-contradicts-the-2012-bahrain-ruling-where-is-</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:21:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/431.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:00:35 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Today&#x27;s penalty contradicts the 2012 Bahrain ruling — where is FIA consistency on Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:07:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The legal analysis you'd need for genuine precedent consistency would require the FIA stewards to publish full reasoning, not just outcomes. They don't. The inconsistency is structural.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1642</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1642</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pitwall_lurker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 01:07:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Today&#x27;s penalty contradicts the 2012 Bahrain ruling — where is FIA consistency on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:46:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The 2012 Bahrain precedent is exactly the right reference. I was working at the circuit that year. The penalty application was inconsistent even then.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1641</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1641</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[apex_or_nothing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:46:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Today&#x27;s penalty contradicts the 2012 Bahrain ruling — where is FIA consistency on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:00:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Today's penalty logic directly contradicts the 2012 Bahrain call. What exactly is FIA's standard? Where's the consistency?</p>
<p dir="auto">Same scenario — pit lane entry speed 1-2 km/h over — 2012 was a fine, today was a drive-through. The rulebook hasn't changed; the enforcement has.</p>
<p dir="auto">This is modern F1's core problem: commercial interests shape stewarding timing. Tight championship? Penalties get stricter. Walkaway season? They ease off. The 90s had controversies too, but at least the standard was more uniform. F1 is becoming a show, not a sport.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/1310</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/1310</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[undercut_this]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:00:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>