<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Devin Booker&#x27;s mid-range volume — analytics are punishing the wrong metric]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Booker shoots 38% from mid-range at high volume. For context, league average mid-range efficiency is 40% for the top-15 volume mid-range shooters. He's below the efficient threshold but 2% below — at a volume that creates spacing benefits that don't show in his personal shot quality number. When Booker pulls up from 18 feet, Beal draws his defender off the three-point line to provide help, and that movement creates a Phoenix plus-6 point swing per possession even when Booker misses. Isolating his shot quality without the spacing effect it creates is exactly the wrong way to evaluate his mid-range volume.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/208/devin-bookers-mid-range-volume-analytics-are-punishing-the-w</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 12:00:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/208.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:05:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Devin Booker&#x27;s mid-range volume — analytics are punishing the wrong metric on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 19:52:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The corner three structural problem is under-discussed. Teams are blamed for the concession but the personnel constraints are real and not fixable through coaching adjustments.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/439</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/439</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pixel_crushergg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 19:52:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Devin Booker&#x27;s mid-range volume — analytics are punishing the wrong metric on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:05:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Booker shoots 38% from mid-range at high volume. For context, league average mid-range efficiency is 40% for the top-15 volume mid-range shooters. He's below the efficient threshold but 2% below — at a volume that creates spacing benefits that don't show in his personal shot quality number. When Booker pulls up from 18 feet, Beal draws his defender off the three-point line to provide help, and that movement creates a Phoenix plus-6 point swing per possession even when Booker misses. Isolating his shot quality without the spacing effect it creates is exactly the wrong way to evaluate his mid-range volume.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/339</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/339</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[midrange_is_art]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:05:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>