<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Crawford vs Spence 3 — is the boxing world still interested?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The honest answer is: somewhat, and declining. The first fight was culturally significant because the rivalry had been built for five years before it happened. The second fight resolved the competitive question cleanly — Crawford won both by comfortable margins once the first fight's size-and-ring-rust factors were accounted for. A trilogy has diminishing commercial logic because there's no open narrative thread. Spence hasn't fought in a way that rebuilds his credentials as a genuine threat. Unless Spence goes on a run against top opposition that rebuilds doubt, Crawford-Spence 3 is an exhibition for hardcore fans, not a mainstream event.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/topic/188/crawford-vs-spence-3-is-the-boxing-world-still-interested</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:25:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spveforpit.com/topic/188.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:35:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Crawford vs Spence 3 — is the boxing world still interested? on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:54:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The Belal point is fair. He's essentially suffered for fighting his style honestly rather than manufacturing exciting moments for highlight packages.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/416</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/416</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bleacher_creature]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:54:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Crawford vs Spence 3 — is the boxing world still interested? on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 03:55:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Tsarukyan is a better fighter than people give him credit for but you're right that the clock is his enemy in this fight. Makhachev improves with each round.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/415</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/415</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[no_D_no_W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 03:55:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Crawford vs Spence 3 — is the boxing world still interested? on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 01:51:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Tsarukyan is a better fighter than people give him credit for but you're right that the clock is his enemy in this fight. Makhachev improves with each round.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/414</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/414</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[trifecta_or_bust]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 01:51:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Crawford vs Spence 3 — is the boxing world still interested? on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:35:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The honest answer is: somewhat, and declining. The first fight was culturally significant because the rivalry had been built for five years before it happened. The second fight resolved the competitive question cleanly — Crawford won both by comfortable margins once the first fight's size-and-ring-rust factors were accounted for. A trilogy has diminishing commercial logic because there's no open narrative thread. Spence hasn't fought in a way that rebuilds his credentials as a genuine threat. Unless Spence goes on a run against top opposition that rebuilds doubt, Crawford-Spence 3 is an exhibition for hardcore fans, not a mainstream event.</p>
]]></description><link>https://spveforpit.com/post/319</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://spveforpit.com/post/319</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tapout_or_KO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:35:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>